Rendered at 20:09:05 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
raincole 3 days ago [-]
Off topic: Perhaps it's just me, but I have a pet peeve about emojis in anything formal. Even before LLMs, I instinctively took a repo less seriously when README.md had emojis in every section. And now LLMs have popularized that style, it's the first signal for me to vibe-detect AI repos.
I do use emojis. I love them, actually, but only in message apps.
frollogaston 3 days ago [-]
I don't like to see them anywhere. They were cool for a while back in version 1.0 when there were a few that everyone knew and used in creative ways, before Apple* decided to make so many that you need a search bar. It's kinda like Pokémon. At this point I only get them in text messages from old people.
* yeah I know technically the Unicode Consortium, but Apple pushed it hard
stouset 3 days ago [-]
Emoji (and their predecessor, emoticons) are IMO the greatest new feature for written language that has happened in generations. Eschewing them is certainly a choice you can make, but I personally think it's a poor one.
Authors can now bundle emotional sentiment in text communication. Not being able to do this in the past was usually just an annoyance but could occasionally turn out to be extremely problematic. Countless miscommunications have occurred due to recipients not correctly interpreting an author's tone, and we now have a tool that can help reduce or potentially eliminate those misunderstandings. It's early days, so we're still seeing teething issues: different emoji sets conveying subtly different cues and evolving social norms around their use. But they have incredible potential.
frollogaston 3 days ago [-]
We already had that ;)
Again emoji 1.0 was good. You can convey what you need with a small subset of that even. But even if modern computers were limited to emoji 1.0, I suspect they'd have been equally spammed to the point of losing meaning anyway.
3eb7988a1663 3 days ago [-]
However, the lack of standardization between platforms causes its own miscommunication. Some of the icons between Apple and Google can be interpreted in significantly different ways.
There is also the pistol[0] which depending on the platform is a water gun or revolver.
I explicitly called out different emoji sets conveying subtly different meanings.
frollogaston 3 days ago [-]
Well Apple emojis are de facto standard, the rest follow. Even the stupid water gun.
mannykannot 2 days ago [-]
If only Keats or Plath had emoji!
stouset 2 days ago [-]
People surely thought a similar sentiment about spaces between words and punctuation.
mannykannot 1 days ago [-]
Anyone claiming those developments enabled the expression of something previously inexpressible would have been mistaken.
3 days ago [-]
hollerith 3 days ago [-]
And yet you are here, a site completely devoid of emoji.
stouset 2 days ago [-]
Because the social norms of this place currently discourage it.
I also don’t use contractions in formal writing settings. Does that make them bad?
hollerith 2 days ago [-]
I think the site owner actively filters them out and has been doing so ever since you joined this site in 2011.
But no matter the reason for the complete lack of emoji, the fact that you like this site enough to participate here is evidence that emoji don't actually improve public discussion as much as you think they would.
There are many many sites on which you could have chosen to participate where emoji are common and can be used freely.
stouset 2 days ago [-]
You choose to participate here instead of having face-to-face conversations. Does that mean that face-to-face discussions aren't useful? I walk on sidewalks where cars are prohibited. Does that mean that cars aren't useful? I drive on highways where pedestrians are prohibited. Does that mean walking isn't useful?
Whatever point you're trying to make, this is an extremely ineffective argument for it. You’re in “checkmate, atheists” territory here.
mannykannot 1 days ago [-]
> You choose to participate here instead of having face-to-face conversations.
Nothing about the comment you are replying to implies an abstinence from face-to-face conversations, and the suggestion is not very plausible.
stouset 22 hours ago [-]
It seems you understand my point.
frollogaston 2 days ago [-]
Isn't there a comic about this kind of argument? I don't think emojis add anything, but lack of emojis on HN doesn't say anything about that, other than the creator probably doesn't like them either.
Auracle 3 days ago [-]
You know, I would actually use little Pokemon sprite emojis, unlike the real thing.
Affric 3 days ago [-]
Emoji are fun to use because they make written communication more human… corporations or LLMs using them just comes off as insincere.
ErigmolCt 2 days ago [-]
Emoji work well when they feel like a tiny bit of personality leaking through the text
zzo38computer 2 days ago [-]
I do not use emoji and I do not have (and do not want) colourful emoji on my computer (emoji as ordinary text characters would be acceptable for the purpose of displaying texts that have emoji, but I don't really need to that much, even if the texts have them, so I can do without that, too). The reason does not have to do with AI; I think that things can rarely be explained better with emoji, and is usually better to explain by text, and sometimes also diagrams will help (for computer programs, having good documentation is very helpful). (I also don't like Unicode.)
ErigmolCt 2 days ago [-]
Emoji themselves aren't the problem. It's more that context changes the meaning completely
geophph 3 days ago [-]
Not just you!
thenthenthen 3 days ago [-]
Or SSID’s
bombcar 3 days ago [-]
[flagged]
2 days ago [-]
3 days ago [-]
9dev 3 days ago [-]
> We mapped almost 1:1 to SoftBank’s set, though Apple chose to omit a few of the more risqué ones.
Which are these risqué emojis mentioned here? I don't think I have ever seen any that are even slightly graphic, which is probably why all the emoji slang conventions have spread like fire (Aubergine, Peach, etc.)
cryzinger 3 days ago [-]
I was going to say that the love hotel emoji was the only one I could think of, but in the process of trying to find the emojipedia link (https://emojipedia.org/love-hotel) I found a Reddit thread that leads to a now-defunct blog post:
Its kinda odd how a lot of the major tech companies have self censored emojis like they are some savior of the planet for doing so.
For example the gun emoji by turning it into a water pistol instead of a real looking firearm handgun lol.
WOW THEY SURE CAUSED COUNTLESS LIVES TO BE SAVED W THAT ONE SINGLE MOVE!
pc86 3 days ago [-]
It's virtue signaling - nonsense from the same people who unironically say things like "lived experience" and "emotional labor." It shows they're part of a particular group, so they're Good, and if you're not, you're Bad.
mft_ 2 days ago [-]
I disagree - I think it might be more about predictable-hassle-avoidance.
The media landscape is all about creating sensation, trying to find an edge from something a politician said or a corporation did to generate a headline and some clicks. And as we know, companies like Apple are heavily scrutinised because they’re even better at driving clicks.
So I think Apple is incentivised to look for things which in a reasonable world wouldn’t even register, but which might cause some minor sensation they’d have to deal with, and snuff out that risk beforehand.
Cider9986 3 days ago [-]
Stickers are for you. Plenty of uncensored content and as soon as you send one from one of your packs, the recipient can start using them anywhere as well.
It is free PR so corporations lap that kind of thing up.
pimlottc 3 days ago [-]
That's a good question. Comparing the Softbank emoji from June 2008 [0] and the initial batch of Apple emoji that shipping in iPhone OS 2.2 (Nov 2008) [1], it doesn't look like there are any missing at all, it's a perfect 1:1 mapping.
Maybe edit rather than omit? Apple changed the people kissing with actual lip contact, the 1910s-looking cancan dancers, and the stink lines on the poop.
stringfood 3 days ago [-]
long eggplant and a smaller Pinching Hand emoji were probably the first to go
3 days ago [-]
holistio 3 days ago [-]
There is still no walnut emoji. Blonde-haired, black-skinned pregnant man? Yes. Walnut? No.
By the way, Walnut Creek is less than 100 miles from Cupertino.
I love walnuts.
CGMthrowaway 3 days ago [-]
I'll bet you could find a place named after most any nut within 100 miles of Cupertino.
3 days ago [-]
Jtarii 3 days ago [-]
Gotta love websites that hijack basic browser functions, in this case forcing smooth scroll on.
embedding-shape 3 days ago [-]
Seems to be some sort of design agency or similar, it's basically internet-law at this point that those always fuck with the scroll movements of your browser, for some reason.
hollerith 3 days ago [-]
Gotta love browsers that let websites hijack basic browser functions.
frollogaston 3 days ago [-]
Yeah I felt that and left so fast, forget that
ErigmolCt 2 days ago [-]
Also "petty, small change" is exactly the right scale for a walnut emoji campaign
hbn 3 days ago [-]
I love the pregnant man emoji, I use it all the time after a big meal
asdff 3 days ago [-]
No more gun emoji. Humanity could not be trusted with the cartoon revolver emoji. Take your squirtgun, citizen.
j1000 3 days ago [-]
Also no thief emoji or pirate emoji. Can someone enlighten me why we don't have it?
dagmx 3 days ago [-]
Simply because nobody has successfully pitched the Unicode group to add one.
Anyone can pitch new emoji, they just have to go through the fairly easy but strict formal process.
blanched 3 days ago [-]
Alex Schmidt, a humor writer (formerly of Cracked and others) did this process for the bison emoji. I enjoyed his “miniseries” about it: https://www.bisonemojipodcast.com/
basch 3 days ago [-]
does the reverse notebooklm exist yet that turns podcasts into longform journalism?
blanched 3 days ago [-]
Not that I know of. And I generally prefer written pieces to podcasts :).
I was looking for a pirate emoji like 5 minutes ago. I'm sure it's not the first time but I'm super surprised that still isn't in there. Seems so obvious.
frollogaston 3 days ago [-]
Well there's a pirate flag
wvbdmp 3 days ago [-]
What’s next, a cowboy emoji? A ninja emoji? But seriously, as much as I like emojis, I kind of feel like they should stick to emotions. Maybe other intangible things. They’re hard to convey verbally (and succinctly), simple concrete nouns are good for a bit of fun and for UI icons, but really not very useful if we’re being honest. Unless you’re texting with a lizard, or my lazy elementary-school niece who shouldn’t really have a phone anyway…
customguy 3 days ago [-]
If we add 26 more emojis, one for each letter, we could use them to spell out all sorts of words - emotions, objects, anything!
26 emojis? You could do the entire bestiary from the original Rogue with that!
holistio 3 days ago [-]
Or you're texting with people whose native language uses a logographic system.
helterskelter 3 days ago [-]
We got the mpreg emoji instead of a chainsaw, which makes me feel like we need an emoji lobbying group for things like sex, drugs, sawed-off shotguns and jury nullification.
ErigmolCt 2 days ago [-]
Representation emojis and object emojis are solving different problems
carrozo 3 days ago [-]
still no Guillotine Emoji either, although not for a lack of trying.
If the author is reading this, the hyperlink to the book in the first paragraph is broken. Looks like it's attempting to direct you to an absolute url that was meant to be relative.
<a href="https://books/face-with-tears-of-joy">
amelius 3 days ago [-]
In case anyone is actually interested in the emoji:
I do use emojis. I love them, actually, but only in message apps.
* yeah I know technically the Unicode Consortium, but Apple pushed it hard
Authors can now bundle emotional sentiment in text communication. Not being able to do this in the past was usually just an annoyance but could occasionally turn out to be extremely problematic. Countless miscommunications have occurred due to recipients not correctly interpreting an author's tone, and we now have a tool that can help reduce or potentially eliminate those misunderstandings. It's early days, so we're still seeing teething issues: different emoji sets conveying subtly different cues and evolving social norms around their use. But they have incredible potential.
Again emoji 1.0 was good. You can convey what you need with a small subset of that even. But even if modern computers were limited to emoji 1.0, I suspect they'd have been equally spammed to the point of losing meaning anyway.
There is also the pistol[0] which depending on the platform is a water gun or revolver.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_emoji
I also don’t use contractions in formal writing settings. Does that make them bad?
But no matter the reason for the complete lack of emoji, the fact that you like this site enough to participate here is evidence that emoji don't actually improve public discussion as much as you think they would.
There are many many sites on which you could have chosen to participate where emoji are common and can be used freely.
Whatever point you're trying to make, this is an extremely ineffective argument for it. You’re in “checkmate, atheists” territory here.
Nothing about the comment you are replying to implies an abstinence from face-to-face conversations, and the suggestion is not very plausible.
Which are these risqué emojis mentioned here? I don't think I have ever seen any that are even slightly graphic, which is probably why all the emoji slang conventions have spread like fire (Aubergine, Peach, etc.)
12 years ago - Apple removes beer, wine, love hotel, and other emojis from insertion palette in Messages app https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/2qqaya/apple_removes...
The blog it links to is dead, so here's an archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20150312182931/http://blog.getem...
For example the gun emoji by turning it into a water pistol instead of a real looking firearm handgun lol.
WOW THEY SURE CAUSED COUNTLESS LIVES TO BE SAVED W THAT ONE SINGLE MOVE!
The media landscape is all about creating sensation, trying to find an edge from something a politician said or a corporation did to generate a headline and some clicks. And as we know, companies like Apple are heavily scrutinised because they’re even better at driving clicks.
So I think Apple is incentivised to look for things which in a reasonable world wouldn’t even register, but which might cause some minor sensation they’d have to deal with, and snuff out that risk beforehand.
https://signalstickers.org/
0: https://emojipedia.org/softbank/2008
1: https://emojipedia.org/apple/iphone-os-2.2
By the way, Walnut Creek is less than 100 miles from Cupertino.
I love walnuts.
Anyone can pitch new emoji, they just have to go through the fairly easy but strict formal process.
The show notes for episode 2 have good references (no fun commentary though): https://www.bisonemojipodcast.com/show-notes
https://www.carrozo.com/guillotine-emoji
https://emojipedia.org/apple
Interesting tidbit:
> Emoji support required iPhone OS 2.2 and a SoftBank SIM card.
What exactly do you think the "GenAI" trained on?
I miss Steve Jobs
https://logandark.net/files/328S6690-9Q368809-16843Q53-RR2SN...