Rendered at 05:20:51 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
BoiledCabbage 15 hours ago [-]
Nice to try something different.
My feedback was it seemed like it was interesting to make, but for me at least not really interesting to solve.
It felt more like solving two crosswords than a single combined one.
Places where lots letters are shared between the two make it interesting, but they're weren't many. Sharing a single vowel 'e' isn't too interesting. Otherwise the just share the length which I already know the length for a crossword clue.
It seems like there is a cool idea in there and keep working on it, it just isn't there for me yet.
daveoshawrus 15 hours ago [-]
Thanks for the feedback. The additional factor which changes it from just two crosswords which happen to have the exact same grid is of course the shared letters as you said (the amount of these varies from puzzle to puzzle), but also it's that the clues are fully themed internally and connected to the other theme. Obviously I appreciate that it's not necessarily for everyone, and I appreciate the honest criticism. Cheers
limbero 16 hours ago [-]
I did the " Separated by a Common Flame" puzzle (you're doing something funky with copy/paste so I had to right click to copy the title and all the clues).
It's fun, but I have some pointers.
1. Try to follow NYT's cluing rules, like plural clues always have plural answers. I was tripped up by "Bark pieces soaked before scattering over coals (8)" having the answer WOODCHIP.
2. It's very difficult. I solve NYT pretty handily 7 days a week, and difficult crosswords in Swedish too, but I ended up using 21 hints, and not only because I rushed. The lack of crosses makes it a lot harder to get a lock on the grid.
3. There was some questionable cluing in general, like "Shredded cabbage side at every British barbecue (8)" for COLESLAW, which I would not consider a particularly British side, and "Shallow inflatable pool beside the barbecue (8)" for PADDLING. Omitting the noun for that type of compounded adjective-noun word is fine I guess but felt clunky.
I like the gimmick itself though!
daveoshawrus 16 hours ago [-]
Thanks, I appreciate the feedback! I'll look into the plurality issue.
zem 7 hours ago [-]
feedback as a crossword setter: published newspaper crosswords have rules around where you can have unchecked squares (where "checked" means "the same letter appears in two different words"). the most basic rule for new york times style american crosswords is "zero unchecked squares", and for british style blocked crosswords it is "no word should have two consecutive unchecked squares". not following either of those conventions gives the crosswords an amateurish feel, and also contributes to the "feels way too hard" feedback some other people have left.
daveoshawrus 7 hours ago [-]
Thank you, I'll look into implementing those rules.
zem 7 hours ago [-]
good luck! I will note that it's significantly harder filling a properly checked grid entirely with thematic words (I've done it but I certainly wouldn't want to do one a day), but in your case having a common letter in two overlapping words would count as checking so that might make things a bit easier.
Really appreciate all the valuable feedback from everyone so far. New puzzles are published every day, so feel free to play more during this week and let me know what you think. Thanks everyone.
brenschluss 15 hours ago [-]
The “featured on scrolllaunch” banner covers the keyboard.
daveoshawrus 15 hours ago [-]
Thanks, yes that was a quick error I had to fix, hopefully works now. probably shouldn't be adding badges on launch day ha.
oidar 16 hours ago [-]
Doesn't load on latest firefox.
daveoshawrus 16 hours ago [-]
Would you mind trying now? If it still doesn't work, it could be Firefox Enhanced Tracking Protection blocking Supabase. Thank you for the feedback.
daveoshawrus 16 hours ago [-]
Thank you, I appreciate the feedback, I'll check it out.
My feedback was it seemed like it was interesting to make, but for me at least not really interesting to solve.
It felt more like solving two crosswords than a single combined one.
Places where lots letters are shared between the two make it interesting, but they're weren't many. Sharing a single vowel 'e' isn't too interesting. Otherwise the just share the length which I already know the length for a crossword clue.
It seems like there is a cool idea in there and keep working on it, it just isn't there for me yet.
It's fun, but I have some pointers.
1. Try to follow NYT's cluing rules, like plural clues always have plural answers. I was tripped up by "Bark pieces soaked before scattering over coals (8)" having the answer WOODCHIP.
2. It's very difficult. I solve NYT pretty handily 7 days a week, and difficult crosswords in Swedish too, but I ended up using 21 hints, and not only because I rushed. The lack of crosses makes it a lot harder to get a lock on the grid.
3. There was some questionable cluing in general, like "Shredded cabbage side at every British barbecue (8)" for COLESLAW, which I would not consider a particularly British side, and "Shallow inflatable pool beside the barbecue (8)" for PADDLING. Omitting the noun for that type of compounded adjective-noun word is fine I guess but felt clunky.
I like the gimmick itself though!
This would be a perfect entry for https://hnarcade.com